![]() |
Winter 'Kolf' in Holland. See below. |
Preface to 2025.
I finished the last diary entry with a funeral on October 25th
(St Crispin’s Day). The weather remained
funereal for some while thereafter and there was little to cheer us
up. The clear-cut victory of Donald
Trump in the US Presidential election depressed approximately half of the
US population, and substantially more than half of my US friends and
acquaintances. His subsequent bizarre
choices of confederates (if I may use that word in reference to US politics)
has done nothing to reassure us. A
unifying theme according to many observers is that most of them are climate
change sceptics. One of the most unusual
is Robert F Kennedy Jr, nephew of the former president John F Kennedy. He will head Health and Human Services. With no medical qualification and a vaccine
sceptic too, it remains possible that he will not get through the screening
process. For example, his bizarre
escapade in dumping a bear carcase in New York’s Central Park, may count
against him.
New Year 2025
January 1st.
'Between my finger and my thumb
The squat pen rests; snug as a gun...' (From 'Digging' by Seamus Heaney)
I think that Heaney wrote this while he was waiting for inspiration,
struggling to write. The pen sat in his hand awaiting instructions from
his brain. In the modern day I sit (or do not sit if feeling lethargic)
at a keyboard, but the state of mind between the will to act and the act itself
is the same. Seamus Heaney sat there in the study and while he looked out
of the window, either in the flesh, or in his imagination, he saw his father
digging.
His father was digging his potato drills, and Heaney then remembered his
grandfather who could '...cut more turf (peat) in a day/ Than any other
man on Toner's bog.' His poem was under way, and it is the first
verse in his early collection entitled 'Death of a Naturalist' (1966).Although
lauded worldwide, and awarded a Nobel prize in 1995, a friend who met him in
the pub in Kirkwall, Orkney, during the St Magnus festival, described him as a
delightful character. He was charming, and not in the way that many media
figures are - professionally charming because they have to be - but genuinely
so.
I mention this because ever since I last posted, the lassitude and
ordinariness of everyday life has induced a writer's block, occasioned more by
sympathy for my readers than anything else. Who wants to read about
forgetting to put the bin out, golf course rounds in the high 80s, acquiring
hearing aids (another badge of age), or attending funerals? Or indeed the
pettiness of our new Labour government, the disaster of the U.S. Presidential
election, or the steadily deteriorating UK weather as it darkens into
December? The activities of the four horseman of the apocalypse continue
unabated and are perpetual, so there is little point in mentioning them either.
But now it is January, and in Dorset the daffodils are beginning to show
their heads above ground. I saw a camellia in full bloom the other day.
What else has happened? A friend posted about his 50th birthday on
Facebook, asking whether it was a millstone or a milestone. Would that I
could remember that far back. (I can. We went skiing. We had
a notable lunch party).
On the 4th of November I visited friends on the other side of the harbour,
and was delayed in my return. The Barfleur (cross-channel ferry) made its
final return voyage to Cherbourg after its Poole crossing and the ferry waited
while it surged through the channel at the Haven. Somehow the Barfleur,
at least to me, marks the beginning and the end of summer. On the
following day the U.S. held an election and we all know what happened then.
On the 7th November (it has taken a long time to organise this), a group of
us who lived at International Students' House during the early 1970s returned
for a reunion. Though much changed physically we were unchanged in our
friendship and camaraderie. For many years a fine bust of John F Kennedy
stood outside the house, but following vandalism it was rescued and restored
and I was pleased to see that it now sits in the lobby of the building at the
top of Great Portland Street (anyone can walk in to view it if they
wish). We will meet again in 2025.
Reviewing my little diary of items that have struck my imagination (they are
very few), I was intrigued to see a paper in the New England Journal of
Medicine detailing the success of fish skin grafts in healing of diabetic foot
ulcers. Yes, I am a snapper-up of unconsidered trifles.
The unchanging round of the everyday improved with visits to London; to the
Christmas lights and to the theatre (David Tennant as Macbeth, Mark Strong and
Lesley Manville in a rewriting of Oedipus, and a quirky but excellent
production of Twelfth Night at the Richmond Orange Tree Theatre).
A particular happiness came on 22nd November with the birth of daughter
Katie's first child, a boy; to be christened Finley George.
Resting over Christmas, my brainwashed into Christianity self enjoyed the
quality of the singing and the splendour of King's College Chapel in the annual
festival of Nine Lessons and Carols. Seeing the chapel again always
brings back memories of being freely allowed entry as an undergraduate (now a
tourist pay-to-visit venue) and my Uncle, who was a Don at the less well-off college
next door, St Catharine's.
Uncle Robert fulminated against the college, 'Showing off their bloody
Rubens again', he used to harrumph when the annual carol service was
shown. 'Of course', he used to say, 'Keynes made them a fortune by
gambling on the stock market in the 1930s.' He rarely had a good word to
say about the college and I will spare you some of his comments about their
fellows, whom he regarded as very left wing and beyond the pale. The
worst epithet he could summon up about a fellow scientist who was more in the
public eye than merited; whose research he regarded as meretricious was, 'He's
a Spiv - he'll never get his FRS with that work.' The decision by King's
College to alter the 15th century architecture of the chapel to render the
Rubens painting more visible for television viewers sparked substantial
criticism from many, not just Uncle Robert.
It is true that John Maynard Keynes, the economist, became bursar at the
college, and began to speculate with the college assets. At that time
(between the wars) it was the prevailing view that investments should be in
real estate or fixed income, and Keynes invested in equities. Some idea
of his skill and success can be gained from the results: during a period in
which the Wall Street Crash and the Second World War was fought, Keynes
returned a steady 15% on the assets, and of course became very wealthy
himself. One wonders, in this cynical age, whether he had inside
information on occasions, but he also pursued new investment strategies such as
'futures'.
C.P. Snow, author, was another fellow whom Robert could not stand.
Robert mixed with several of the serious scientists at Christ's College who
rarely had a good word to say about him. It is a known fact that Snow
published a paper in Nature on a new method of synthesis of Vitamin A which was
subsequently shown to be incorrect. After 'The Masters' was published in
1951, there was widespread anger at Snow's revelations about college
politics. The plot revolves around the Master of an unnamed college who is
dying and the various factions supporting one or other of two candidates.
At High Table in 1952, Robert secretly enjoyed the fulminations of the various
fellows who came up to him in secret and whispered their detestation of
Snow. Some of them had of course been caricatured in 'The Masters'.
Many years later, during my last year at Cambridge in 1970, I invited my
reluctant aunt to come to the special combined Oxford and Cambridge footlights
with me. She sat stony faced through most of the show, until one of the
undergraduates joked about 'C.P. Snow; known to writers as a scientist, to
scientists as a writer, and the world at large as Pamela Hansford
Johnson.' She laughed unrestrainedly. The Snow antipathy had
lingered. This show was one of the best ever of that era in Cambridge,
featuring Clive James and Pete Atkin, Julie Covington, Diana Quick, Rob
Buckman, and Jonathan James-Moore. The show had been professionally
buffed by its producer, David Frost, and it went on tour to New York, though whether
they understood the sketches is not recorded. Julie Covington's
performance of 'The Magic Wasn't There', a song written by James and Atkin, was
described as the gem of the Edinburgh Festival by the well-known theatre
critic, Harold Hobson.
Early January.
I hope that I can raise a smile. I am included in
a group dedicated to the radio panel game, I'm Sorry I Haven't A Clue. It
seems to me that there are some very clever people out there, though the
predominant form of wit on the site is pun-related; scorned by some.
Recently one of the moderators asked for suggestions for films to be shown at
the I'm Sorry I Haven't A Clue Welsh film club. Here are some of the best.
I find the effect is cumulative:
Welsh Film Club:
Look Bach in Bangor
Where Eagles Aberdare
Dial M for Merthyr
How Haverfordwest Was Won
The Eagle has Llandudno
Who Framed Roger Rarebit?
Myfanwy and Other Animals
No Country for Mold Men
Bridgend Jones' Diary
Dai Another Day
Evans Can Wait
Eisteddfod in Alex
How Green Was My Valet
Last Tango in Powys
Glamorgan: a Suitable Case for Treatment
Sheepless in Seattle
The Lloyd of the Rings
Nine and a Half Leeks
Bonnie and Clwyd
The Magnificent Severn
Debbie Does Dowlais
The above was written in early January, and flippancy aside, I feel it is
difficult to write about such matters today (January 27th) because there are
several events this afternoon to commemorate the 80th Anniversary of the
liberation of Auschwitz. A strange anniversary date because it is also
the anniversary of the birth of Mozart. I cannot write much at the moment
anyway because on 14th January I fell off a snowy path (not skiing) onto a
concrete patio landing on my right shoulder, putting my lateral clavicle into
at least three pieces. As a doctor, I know it is better to be an
interesting rather than a mundane patient, and the jigsaw puzzle of my collar
bone has exercised quite a few orthopaedic surgeons, who participate in a local
society called 'The Shoulder Group'. My pain is their enjoyment.
'Doctors can bear a very large amount of pain - in other people', a favourite
Somerset Maugham quotation of mine from a character suffering from cancer in
his play, 'For Services Rendered'. So it hurts to type and that must be
all for the moment.
![]() |
Disruption of lateral third of clavicle |
![]() |
Probably my last ski photo ever. Top of the mountain in the early morning. |
![]() |
My first ever ski photo. January 1974. Top of the Valluga, St Anton. Taken by a very kindly German gentleman who sent me the print all the way from Cologne. Note the old fashioned equipment. |
February 2nd. Typing is a little easier and there is some sunshine
today - perhaps the winter is receding?
A brief trip to London last week. Unable to get into a preferred
choice of theatre, I booked to see a new play at the Royal Court, 'A Good
House', which had received a 5 star review in the Telegraph. The plot
concerns an upwardly mobile black couple who move into 'Stillwater', a
dominantly white housing development. Sihle, the husband is obviously earning
more than the other white residents, and his wife has social pretensions, such
as a wine aerator and a cheese knife on the platter when entertaining their
neighbours. The obvious prejudices surface throughout the play: Chris and
Lynette have never been to Sihle and Bonolo's house before until a shack pops
up nearby, potentially devaluing all their properties; Sihle has never been
included in the neighbourhood WhatsApp group, etc. Critics have seen this
(with one or two exceptions) as a sizzling personification of the tensions and
underlying prejudices of the modern South Africa. I quote: '(Amy)
Jephta's lacerating, emotionally charged interrogation of the quotidian (sic)
realities and ambiguities of post-apartheid Cape Town marks her out as one of
South Africa's leading contemporary playwrights, and suggests that South
Africa's drama scene is in rude health.' It seemed to me rather too
predictable and I was in the three star camp. The Royal Court not only
sells you a programme, but mandatorily includes the play script, and I note the
author's directions that there are quite a few places where the characters are
meant to speak lines together (so one does not catch either). Her direction that the speeches should be
fast, 'Like Really Fast', is not only unrealistic, but again risks the
spectator not fully appreciating the lines. The antithesis of the Pinter
pause! In addition I found myself worrying that the actress playing the character
of Jess, an ultra slim, ultra-flexible embodiment of a yoga teacher might have
mitral valve prolapse.
Prior to the play, I visited the National Gallery. I became a member late last year in the hope
that I might get to the Van Gogh exhibition, celebrating the gallery’s
bicentenary, but without success. But members
have a separate entrance now, which reduces queueing time. Entry is rather similar to an airport
security check, certainly since Just Stop Oil sprayed orange paint and dye on
‘Sunflowers’ (which is behind glass). I
had forgotten just how many amazing paintings are in our national collection,
including four out of Vermeer’s known thirty-five paintings. But there are so many other wonders. A large group of schoolchildren was gathered
in front of Velasquez’ Rokeby Venus, and a curator tour was in progress before
the group of Titians featuring Diana and Actaeon. But my lasting thought- why on earth do we
not charge overseas visitors to visit our galleries? Half of China and Japan were here, snappily
burdening their iPhones with the images. Something I had not heard of before was a ‘Tronie’,
the Dutch word for face, which typifies many of their portraits, often with
exaggerated facial expressions.
Some of my favourite works therefore are those of the Dutch 17th
Century, including the wonderful sea pictures of the Van Der Veldes, father and
son. The only ‘snap’ I took in the
gallery this time was one for my golfing friends. Sometimes the winters here on the golf course
feel like this. Of course the image
comes during the ‘Little Ice Age’.
![]() |
'Kolf' being played on the ice. Dutch, 17th Century |
Among the free (and therefore popular) exhibits was a new look at the history of Constable’s Hay Wain. I was intrigued to learn that when he exhibited it for the first time in London in 1821 it was not thought to be much good. It was the French, some while later, I think at the 1824 Salon, who took to it, and indeed Constable was awarded a gold medal by the French in recognition of its quality. It has remained as an example of ‘Englishness’ ever since and has been much used by cartoonists dating from early in the 20th Century. One re-drawing of it features a barge carrying white goods across the river while nearby, the footballer Wayne Rooney hovers on a jet-ski. The link? Another terrible pun – ‘Hey, Wayne’.
Richmond, London. On the Ted Lasso trail. This picturesque pub is the one in which Ted and Coach 'Beard' ruminate before and after games at 'A.F.C. Richmond'.
February 3rd.
66th
anniversary of Buddy Holly’s death in a plane crash in an Iowa blizzard (yes, I know, pedants – and
the Big Bopper and Ritchie Valens).
Those with a morbid interest can read further – it may have been caused
by the pilot misreading the ‘artificial horizon’ meter on board the Beechcraft
Bonanza.
The wife of a friend, Sally Smith, K.C., whom I am pleased to say I am
beginning to know a little better after a few meetings and a dinner together
with friends, is an author. Her first
novel, ‘Of Mice And Murder’ was published last year and was well received. ‘Conan Doyle with a touch of Rumpole’ was one
comment. A more measured but very
enthusiastic piece in the Literary Review was then followed by a choice as a
‘Radio 2 Book Club’ book. Another book
featuring her legal hero, Sir Gabriel Ward,K.C. follows later this year. I very much enjoyed reading it.
In occasional passages she neatly but gently skewers the legal
profession. For example, she mentions
the elevation of the judge’s desk above the well of the court: ‘This literal and spiritual elevation, while
beneficial to the abstract concept of justice, was not so good for the humility
of the judges.’ Understandably (the
novel is set in 1901) she draws attention to the antipathy towards any possible
female entrance to the bar, despite evidence of greater intelligence than many
male counterparts. Sir Gabriel says; ‘…They
have never seemed obvious to me. In all
my reading I have never seen anything that convinced me of a correlation
between gender and intellect; though certainly it is the case that, by
convention, education and expectation, we do our best to make such a
correlation.’
One character in the novel, Lord Dunning, inevitably makes one think of Lord
‘Tom’ Denning. Perhaps a Freudian
slip? The two characters could not be
more different. If you do not believe
me, read the novel. (Lord Denning’s life
story is worth more than a glance too.)
And finally, with some amusement as a Dorset-dweller, the reclusive Sir
Gabriel considers travelling out of his beloved Temple to investigate the
mystery: ‘Not the most assiduous
attention to the little rituals he adopted to make travel tolerable to him
would enable him to travel to Greenwich, let alone Bournemouth.’
I think it was on this day (February 3rd) that I came down to breakfast
to hear my wife say, ‘Have you heard Trump’s latest?’ (No).
‘He’s going to take over Ghana.’
‘Wow’, I say. Then I wonder, is
it the gold, the cocoa, or the diamonds that is the attraction? But the tagline on the TV corrects me. It is ‘Gaza’.
Perhaps I should demand money back on my relatively new hearing aids. Either plan, Ghana or Gaza, seems a little
fraught with problems though.
Private Eye has published a farewell poem to Jean-Marie Le Pen, right wing
French leader, holocaust denier, etc, etc.
Private Eye tributes are always penned by E.J. Thribb, aged 17½. In this case he has signed himself E.J Le
Thribb, and concludes with the thought that ‘Le Pen was not mightier than Le
Scythe.’
Chris Rapley, CBE, was a year ahead of me at school. He and his colleague, Phil Whitemore, were
considered the only two of their year and our year worth coaching for the S
level physics exam. An Oxford degree, an
MSc at Jodrell Bank, and a PhD at UCL’s Mullard Space Science Laboratory (in
X-ray astronomy) seemed more or less inevitable. He is now Professor of Climate Science at
UCL. Along the way he has been director
of the Science Museum, and director of the British Antarctic Survey, among
other accomplishments. Writing in the
school magazine, however, often a vehicle for self-congratulation, he offers a
lesson in humility. His theme is
attempting to make science interconnected.
Often the great scientists have remarkable knowledge – but in a
pigeonhole of information. At the end of
his article, he wonders why it is that humans do not act on the evidence placed
before them by scientists, and states that natural scientists have much to
learn from social and behavioural research.
As a medical practitioner, and, I like to think, a medical scientist, I
found the following paragraph very telling:
‘Daniel Kahneman, the Nobel prize-winning economist, and expert on human
behaviour, described our mind as “a machine for jumping to conclusions” and
noted that “thinking to humans is as swimming to cats – we can do it, but prefer
not to”. In practice we filter
information according to our predilections, and behave in ways that are all too
often against our best interests. As
social beings we are strongly influenced by our peers’.
On reading this, I could not help thinking of the times as a doctor when I
jumped to conclusions, hopefully more frequently in my earlier rather than my
later career, and I have written at length of examples, which I hope may help
medical students who follow me at a later date.
The ‘against our best interests’ is nicely detailed in the book, ‘The March
of Folly’, by the American historian Barbara Tuchman. She begins with the Wooden Horse of Troy and
ends with the Vietnam War.
In medical practice, the best example
I can think of is a consultant who shall be nameless, whom I worked for many
years ago. Anticoagulants (exclusively
warfarin in those days) may be given to patients who either evince evidence of
thrombosis, or are at high risk for thrombosis.
Given to these patients, a significant number of patients can be saved
from the fatal occurrence of blood clots passing into the lungs (pulmonary
embolism). The down side of treatment is
that a few patients, a very small, but definite number will be harmed by these
drugs. A few will develop gastrointestinal
bleeding and some of these will die. The
sad fact is that one cannot know how many lives will be saved – because they
will live on, oblivious to their treatment.
Only a trial of patients at risk, some of whom are given a placebo, and
some the active treatment will prove the value of the treatment. The physician in question had been asked to
advise about his brother in law, who had an unpleasant deep vein
thrombosis. He advised warfarin
treatment. Unfortunately his brother in
law died from a gastrointestinal bleed.
Thereafter, irrespective of the many trials, which showed benefit, it
became impossible to ask him to ratify a prescription for warfarin, even if the
patient in the bed in front of him was virtually clogged solid with thrombus.
A paper in the British Medical Journal, some years ago, specifically
addressed the bias introduced into medical thinking by past experience, despite
contrary evidence from large scale double blind clinical trials. Professor John Hampton, when lecturing on
‘Evidence Based Medicine’, used to say, ‘When someone says “In my experience”, I reach for my shotgun.’
‘Primum non nocere’, First Do No
Harm, is a byword of medicine, but the moral philosopher will of course see
that in medicine, one often has to choose the lesser of two evils. ‘Drugs are useful poisons’, Nobel laureate
Sir James Black used to say, and he was right.
Another bizarre experience, related to risk and benefit, was described by W
St C Symmers, the pathologist, in one of his books about the rarer reaches of
pathology. Visiting a hospital somewhere
in Africa, he was horrified to see children on the ward, dying of typhoid
fever. ‘But you have chloramphenicol
here’, he said. ‘Oh yes’, was the reply,
‘But we can’t give it because of the risk of agranulocytosis (death from bone
marrow suppression)’.
Chloramphenicol is almost universally successful in curing typhoid. Fatal agranulocytosis only occurs in a tiny
fraction of patients receiving it.
Monday 10th February
Oh dear. A cold day with a
temperature of 3 degrees but the easterly wind makes it feel like minus 1. I have just read ‘Orbital’, last year’s
Booker Prize winner. Best to read the
reviews on Goodreads rather than mine.
Of course, they range from the adulatory to the unimpressed. The one star reviewer seems to have a point
when she talks of the romanticisation of Russia without any mention of
Ukraine. (The book concerns six
astronauts circling the earth on the International Space Station (Russian,
Japanese, English, American).
The Japanese astronaut is presumably there to allow the author to introduce
and meditate on, the 1945 bombing of Nagasaki (the astronaut’s mother survived
the bombing of Nagasaki).
Here is my review – please do not read if you are in the 5 star category –
and don’t look if you are intending to read the book.
Firstly, fortunately it is only 136 pages long. It is described as a novel, though it has no
plot and is either an extended and extremely dry geography lesson, or an
exercise in philosophy (or navel gazing, if you prefer), or a tract written by
a Green MP (not that I disagree with the critique of man’s despoliation of the
earth), or in places an attempt to out-Virginia Virginia Woolf in a stream of
consciousness-like meander.
The relentless search for the telling metaphor or the super-flurry of
adjectives and adverbs left me wanting to go back to the simplicity of
something by Ernest Hemingway (‘Never knowingly used a word which might send a
reader to the dictionary’). Naturally,
Samantha Harvey has qualifications in creative writing and philosophy. It strikes me as the perfect example of a
Booker Prize Winner.
Hmm, got that off my chest, didn’t I?
Maybe it has to do with the constant ache from my fractured
clavicle. I have read that NSAIDs can
impair healing and bone union, so I am trying to wean myself off them.
On second thoughts…
There is one section in the book which does offer real insights into the
minds of the astronaut or cosmonaut. But
are they original? Remember, ‘Good writers borrow, great writers steal’. Perhaps I should not have been surprised to
read that there are so many autobiographies by former astronauts. I have not read any. Looking over the list however, it sounds as
though Chris Hadfield’s autobiography ‘An Astronaut’s Guide to Life on Earth’
is one of the more revealing. Did
Samantha Harvey mine these books? I am
sure she did. The section of the (paperback)
book I have in mind is between pages 72 and 75.
It shows the inhabitants of the ISS gradually becoming aware of the lack
of real boundaries on earth – other than land and sea, and a perplexity about
how we cannot live in peace with one another.
And how our own species has dominated, shaped, and in many cases, ruined
the land we live in 250 miles below.
But, ‘Life is Real, Life is Earnest’
– I think it was Longfellow who wrote that.
And the news is almost universally unbearable. Gaunt malnourished Israeli hostages released
in Gaza, surrounded by hooded gunmen bearing Kalashnikovs. That was really successful, Mr Netanyahu,
wasn’t it? A child in a flat in
Southampton with creeping black mould, like something out of a John Wyndham
science fiction novel. The awfulness of
the Super Bowl half-time show. I am with
Paul Simon. I am the only living boy in
New York.
‘I can gather all the news I need on
the weather report.’
‘Humankind cannot bear very much
reality’.
I do know that was T.S. Eliot.
And as if to prove it, my trivial mind reminds me that there was a
cracking game of rugby this last weekend with England scoring and converting a
try to beat France by one point. For American readers – this is our version of the Super Bowl. It always amuses me when the winners of Super
Bowl are announced portentously (Samatha Harvey – all those adverbs and
adjectives are catching) – as ‘WORLD CHAMPIONS’!
Due to a touch of insomnia, I caught quite a bit of the Super Bowl, which
could be characterised by ‘How are the mighty fallen’? It was widely touted that the Kansas City
Chiefs would win for a third year in a row (known to U.S. sports fans as a ‘Threepeat’). However, the Philadelphia Eagles triumphed by
a wide margin. For those in the know, the
Chiefs quarterback, Patrick Mahomes was ‘sacked’ six times and threw two
interceptions. The Eagles MVP was the appropriately
named Jalen Hurts. For a height of 6’1”
Hurts weighs 222 lbs or 101Kg which appears to be all muscle.
But mention of Virginia Woolf reminds me that I have read one very interesting
and readable book recently – my wife’s book club choice which I purloined for a
short while. Like me, she has got to the
age where it is now wise to read the book only days before the meeting in which
one is due to discuss it, so it was available. ‘Deceived With Kindness’ by Angelica
Garnett. Now… I have never really got to
grips with the Bloomsbury Group. Their painting,
writing, economising etcetera. ‘Who did what, which way up, and to whom’,
or if you prefer a less coarse quotation, ‘Lived
in squares, moved in circles, and loved in triangles’ (Dorothy Parker).
Angelica was the daughter of Clive and Vanessa Bell, though sired as she
afterwards found out by Duncan Grant. Grant
was presumably going through a heterosexual phase at the time. He and Vanessa spent most of the rest of
their lives painting. Angelica movingly
describes how the lack of a true father figure in her life left her feeling
isolated and naïve – the others of her parents’ generation were all just
selfishly doing their own thing. The
counterpart of the 60s and 70s hippy culture perhaps? Poor Angelica was thrown together socially with
her future husband, David ‘Bunny’ Garnett, who was 26 years older than her,
without knowing that Bunny had at least made a pass at her mother, and was also
the lover of Duncan Grant, her biological father. This was a moving and poignant autobiography.
Thursday February 13th
A lovely BSO concert last night – Beethoven’s 1st Symphony,
Elgar’s Cello Concerto, ‘Death and Transfiguration’ (Richard Strauss). The cellist was Laura van der Heijden and the
conductor was Alexander Soddy.
Every time I hear the Elgar concerto it sounds more melancholy than
before. The sadness is unsurprising –
composed in Brinkwells Cottage, near Fittleworth in rural Sussex, as 1918 ebbed
away and a gloomy armistice supervened.
Of this time, when he was often ill, worried by financial problems and
the death of friends, he wrote, ‘Everything good and nice and clean and fresh
and sweet is far away –never to return’ (Note from programme by Andrew Burn).
My former colleague, Dr Peter Clein, a gifted musician himself and father of
Natalie Clein (cellist) and Louisa Clein (actress), once told me that the
abrupt jumps and drops of the scale in the first theme of the Elgar is said to
represent the identical shifts in altitude of the spine of the Malvern Hills,
where Elgar was happiest. The story may
well be apocryphal, but nonetheless it is a pleasant one.
The other day, because I can only walk at the moment, I was getting my exercise on the beach when I met a lady blowing bubbles. These were spectacular bubbles, some three feet across, floated from her own home-made bubble ring constructed of strips of cotton sheeting, suspended between two bamboo poles, which she dipped into her mixture of detergent, baking soda, glycerin, and water. She told me that she found the experience very therapeutic. One needed moisture in the air and a light breeze. Here they are:
It is now cold and blustery. May the
weather (and my shoulder) be better by the time of my next diary.